| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 7 post(s) |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2726
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 00:57:00 -
[1] - Quote
the terrible screeching of highsec apologists is just as gratifying as the change itself |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2728
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 01:38:00 -
[2] - Quote
dinsdale you realise that when module tiericide comes around mission runners'll be laughing when meta 1-3 stuff suddenly isn't total garbage |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2728
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 03:04:00 -
[3] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:It's lovely how you can square the playerbase in such precise brackets: lady fappington's post was mocking dinsdale's absurd labelling you great galumphing turkey
let's talk about prejudiced attitudes towards highsec content creators next |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2730
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 03:19:00 -
[4] - Quote
Arancar Australis wrote:I am looking at an overall view of the point that was made. Irrespective of where a person comes from, whetehr they have or have not played the game, my expectaion would be that they were hired based upon their ability and their merit as a developer.
You are making an assumption that just because a person plays in high se, they have no care factor or knowledge that would make them a good developer. Yes i agree with you that having played the game, you would understand the pain points, but i would also expect that they would look for feed back even if they didn't. Noone's actually making that assumption. They're making fun of Dinsdale's bad logic and insane 'highsec vs. nullsec' conspiracy theories. Noone reasonable believes in 'highsec vs. nullsec'. This thread is not at all serious. |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2730
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 03:20:00 -
[5] - Quote
exception: 'insane carebear highsec forum warriors vs. everyone else' is most certainly a thing |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2730
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 03:32:00 -
[6] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:It's a Dinsdale thread, mate. No one here is being serious but him. And the running theory is that he's a Goon alt for trolling anyway.
And it's scales, not fur. Much easier to keep clean, especially when I spill icecream on my supposed neckbeard. according to dinsdale he's 'being a highsec zealot to counter the nullsec zealots' so he deffo doesn't believe this stuff even if he isn't a troll
i do not understand why he isn't banned for rumour-mongering |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2733
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 07:08:00 -
[7] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Jake Warbird wrote:This thread got interesting at first, now it's just gonna be a political cesspool I guess. Typical tactics. Null sec cartel propagandists want the thread closed, so they hotdrop their thread derailers. ISD locking thread in 3....2....1. JENN ASIDE CREW REPRESENT PEACE OUT DUDES |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2738
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 17:02:00 -
[8] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:@Tippia:
Your evasive reply and refusal to address key facts and ramifications is now sufficient to concern me that there are indeed vested interests in these proposed changes and that all attempts to objectively discuss the actual issues will be deliberately stonewalled and sabotaged.
I will express my dissent by withdrawing from this discussion. Have it "your" way. hahaha no
the amount of loot coming from refined meta mods is probably insignificant next to mining, but having the main reason to pick up loot shouldn't be to refine it. one, because the mods should have a value to the player determined by how useful they are, and two, because everyone prefers minerals come from miners, which is why gun mining has been nerfed so much in the last few years
as i said before in this thread, when module metacide comes around (after ship rebalancing) mission looters'll be laughing when the garbage they're pulling out of cans is suddenly not useless
i'm fully aware of how much of a newbie's income came from looting missions and reprocessing - i did it before the meta 0 removal |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2739
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 17:12:00 -
[9] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:@Tippia:
Your evasive reply and refusal to address key facts and ramifications is now sufficient to concern me that there are indeed vested interests in these proposed changes and that all attempts to objectively discuss the actual issues will be deliberately stonewalled and sabotaged.
I will express my dissent by withdrawing from this discussion. Have it "your" way. Welcome to the "new" and CAOD-ized GD, where a squadron of group-thinkers holds a firm grasp on everything that moves. not too firm a grasp, it blocks off blood flow and reduces pleasure |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2739
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 20:03:00 -
[10] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:
*Snip*
Supporting changes has nothing to do with a narrative or wanting to hurt high sec and everything with wanting to make the game better. If thats unacceptable to you that in the overall attempt to make the game better your particular playstyle has to change a bit, well, tough ****. Our playstyles change near constantly because the game gets changed for the better, welcome to the life of every other player in EVE.
Is anyone else laughing like crazy seeing Grath say something like this? Especially in light of the carrier/drone assist discussions over the last few months. difference is unlike the highsec-identifying forums crazies blubbing about nullsec he put effort into making a reasonable argument on a subject he actually has knowledge on and experience with and got it published
the 'drones don't cause extra lag' bit was silly though |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2740
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 20:11:00 -
[11] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Sorry if you were sorry, you'd stop posting this garbage |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2741
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 23:03:00 -
[12] - Quote
hilariously, this change is part of what's intended to make what they're trying to do worth the effort |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2741
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 23:10:00 -
[13] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:I ragequitted your incessant and repetitive stupidity which forced me to address you when I have no wish to even recognise that you exist. I asked you to stop pestering me, but like the bitchey persona you are, you just don't know when to stop. mate. you kept posting 'stop responding to me i want the last word in this argument'. if he has something to say he's allowed to say it. |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2741
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 23:19:00 -
[14] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Benny Ohu wrote:mate. you kept posting 'stop responding to me i want the last word in this argument'. if he has something to say he's allowed to say it. I didn't want the last word except as to say "I no longer wish to discuss this matter with you". I already stated that he can have it his way as far as I was concerned, and my only interest is disengaging from the discussion. But this is one of those ****s that continues shouting at your back even as you attempt to walk away. no, you've been posting arguments and then trying to tell him to stop responding
you walk away by not doing that |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2741
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 23:30:00 -
[15] - Quote
yeh whatever |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2741
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 23:34:00 -
[16] - Quote
Mario Putzo wrote:Care to explain how that is? not to you, no. |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2741
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 23:40:00 -
[17] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:and with dinsdale hes a well known plebian. Id be very surprised if someone that states some of the things he states would involve anything other than a broom. And insulting his is generally expected I'd like him if he wasn't playing this 'highsec victim' thing all the time. He'll scream at anything that affects missions or highsec incursions. Suprisingly when he's not pulling that act, he posts very well and has good ideas  |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2741
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 23:42:00 -
[18] - Quote
Sephira Galamore wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:so when you mission, you never get salvage, bounties, rewards, lp, nothing like that no? You are aware tho, that there are players playing the profession of a Looter/Salvager, following mission runners, ratters or anom runners? Funnily enough, afaik a lot of nullsec newbies do that, so I don't exactly get Dinsdale's GrrGoons here. (why can't we tractor yellow wrecks that'd be so great for the salvager profession)
e: oh right, carebears'd have a fit  |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2741
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 23:49:00 -
[19] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Those same reasons are no longer pertinent or profitable.
A) Because the 425mm situation will no longer exist. B) The reduction in efficiency means all (both player and loot derived) non-ice/ore refinable items have their base value reduced. C) There will be less trash for reprocessing on the market, cos fewer will bother bringing it in from wrecks. D) The margins of reprocessors drop below sustainability as the low amount of available purchaseable materials drops, and their own refining efficiency is now lower as well.
These are the repercussions. These are the concrete results.
Only an idiot/****** would choose to skill into non-ice/ore refining and a market devoid of materials for reprocessing for profit and at a reduced efficiency with no means to improve it, when they can instead use the same time to skill into ice/ore refining and into a market filled with materials. reprocessing meta 1-4 mods is already terrible and noone sane should be doing it. mining in a t1 barge'd get more isk. (e: i mean, opposed to processing your own mission loot) there's only one non-ore/ice skill anyway. this isn't a 'profession' (what there is of it) worth saving.
i hope that there will be a place for someone to buy ore and reprocess in a starbase or something, though. that's something that doesn't exist currently and has a good chance of being created. |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2741
|
Posted - 2014.03.22 00:04:00 -
[20] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:There will be only a fraction of loot brought in that is now. The margins for re-processors will be so small and elusive that it will become all but extinct. for a short period before it becomes actually extinct when metacide comes through and prices rise above reprocessing value
no real loss, i've no pity at all  |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2741
|
Posted - 2014.03.22 00:07:00 -
[21] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Benny Ohu wrote:for a short period before it becomes actually extinct when metacide comes through and prices rise above mineral price no real loss, i've no pity at all  Speculation. Citation needed. nah we know it's being strongly considered and it's the next logical step after ship rebalancing
one day i might even fit t2 ecm |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2741
|
Posted - 2014.03.22 00:11:00 -
[22] - Quote
i mean it's pretty damned odd that the only use for meta 1-3 garbage is its refining value when the only reason it's so cheap is that it's so bloody useless in its actual role
think about how strange it is when people aren't complaining that the mods are so useless they're primarily used as garbage, they're complaining that the mods are even more useless as garbage by 50% |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2741
|
Posted - 2014.03.22 00:21:00 -
[23] - Quote
Mario Putzo wrote:Benny Ohu wrote:i mean it's pretty damned odd that the only use for meta 1-3 garbage is its refining value when the only reason it's so cheap is that it's so bloody useless in its actual role
think about how strange it is when people aren't complaining that the mods are so useless they're primarily used as garbage, they're complaining that the mods are even more useless as garbage by 50% Just complaining that CCP seems content on killing newbie friendly professions. But hey **** new players right. if you care about the salvaging/looting profession then you should support metacide which'd make loot worth more than its reprocessing value was ever worth |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2741
|
Posted - 2014.03.22 00:25:00 -
[24] - Quote
Mario Putzo wrote:They have been saying they will get around to it for years. Just another tater from CCP to be honest, Rise will quit eventually and the next guy who thinks he is hot **** will take the wheel and lead us back through another cyclical ship and weapon rebalance. the rebalancing team is ytterbium, tallest, fozzie and rise iirc
and they've always said that if it comes it'll be after all the ships are done |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2741
|
Posted - 2014.03.22 00:35:00 -
[25] - Quote
Mario Putzo wrote:Benny Ohu wrote:Mario Putzo wrote:They have been saying they will get around to it for years. Just another tater from CCP to be honest, Rise will quit eventually and the next guy who thinks he is hot **** will take the wheel and lead us back through another cyclical ship and weapon rebalance. the rebalancing team is ytterbium, tallest, fozzie and rise iirc and they've always said that if it comes it'll be after all the ships are done And the ships have never been done they have been rebalancing ships for years. Meta issues have been around for years. Do you not think it is much quicker and easier to say hey ALL the T2 stuff should function better than the Meta 4 stuff. They started tweaking some things, stopped, went on to something else, stopped. Its a clusterfuck of unfocused changes for the sake of changes. Case in point. 2013 Lets buff drone use and damps. OOOPS 2014 Lets nerf drone use and damps. Maybe we can get by adding .01 mass to the Caracal in 1.3 and call it a balance pass. Ya we did cruisers in late 2012 maybe no one will notice though. hahaha on the one hand you say 'just make all t2 better than meta 4' leaving aside meta 1-3 till later then you complain they're analysing and reiterating their previous work
no it's not faster just to make unconsidered changes, that's how ccp's historically screwed up big time
|

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2741
|
Posted - 2014.03.22 00:44:00 -
[26] - Quote
Mario Putzo wrote:Meta 1-3 are balanced to Meta 4 though. They have never been a problem. nah noone uses them
meta 0 - used by the noobiest of newbies (less than a week old) and t2 production, otherwise completely useless meta 1 to 3 - useless except for guns where meta 4 is often too expensive, and prop mods meta 4 - only used for fitting or if you haven't trained t2 meta 5 - standard
faction/officer - guns are useless. some faction are useless, and let's not talk about cosmos
non-t1 meta 0 - wtf is this |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2741
|
Posted - 2014.03.22 00:48:00 -
[27] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Shaddup! Those guys like in NPC null sec (where I still have a some of my stuff by the way).
You don't undestand the game, as they say you know NOTHING about EvE. please don't post like a ****. and that poster's talking about belt/anom gunmining for building so it's safe so say he's Doing It Wrong  |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2741
|
Posted - 2014.03.22 00:50:00 -
[28] - Quote
Mario Putzo wrote:Come on guy. Ive argued with walls who are more consistent than you.
find yourself alone a lot? |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2741
|
Posted - 2014.03.22 01:12:00 -
[29] - Quote
Mario Putzo wrote:Benny Ohu wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Shaddup! Those guys like in NPC null sec (where I still have a some of my stuff by the way).
You don't undestand the game, as they say you know NOTHING about EvE. please don't post like a ****. and that poster's talking about belt/anom gunmining for building so it's safe so say he's Doing It Wrong  By whose standards? Yours? anyone with a calculator |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2741
|
Posted - 2014.03.22 01:22:00 -
[30] - Quote
Mario Putzo wrote:And who gives a **** what he does with his time? Do you pay his sub? seeing him complaining about changes that are being made for his benefit because he can't recognise the value is pretty hilarious, yeah |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2742
|
Posted - 2014.03.22 02:33:00 -
[31] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Tippia wrote:It is not the same amount of work. Yes it is. slow down there  |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2742
|
Posted - 2014.03.22 02:39:00 -
[32] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Benny Ohu wrote:Tippia wrote:Tippia wrote:It is not the same amount of work. Yes it is. slow down there  Yes, yes. Fine. That should teach me to re-use existing quote tags rather than insert my own. other forums get rich text editing :( |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2742
|
Posted - 2014.03.22 04:16:00 -
[33] - Quote
i think we all know who the real victims of this change are
the margin trade scammers using the 'too many units of compressed ore' variant
with more compressed ore on the market this variant won't be possible |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2742
|
Posted - 2014.03.22 04:22:00 -
[34] - Quote
it's a bloody outrage |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2746
|
Posted - 2014.03.22 18:38:00 -
[35] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:I am sorry, I don't value group-thinks, I don't value being all on the same boat, I am all about diversity and complete freedom. If you don't value who has a different opinion than yours, then I am sorry, I value MORE those with a different opinion than those who have the same. basically your opinion's founded on what someone else's isn't
so clever |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2746
|
Posted - 2014.03.22 19:30:00 -
[36] - Quote
baltec was saying things that you'd already been told and mario is a deliberately antagonistic oppositional troll |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2746
|
Posted - 2014.03.22 19:33:00 -
[37] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:I don't found my opinions on anyone elses nor on anyone not elses.
I found them on my ideas which might be impopular but I don't lose a sleep over that. allowing others to dictate what you think, yes |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2761
|
Posted - 2014.03.23 22:36:00 -
[38] - Quote
how to win an argument: misrepresent what the other side is saying, then argue against that. claim you won the argument pages ago. |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2765
|
Posted - 2014.03.24 08:25:00 -
[39] - Quote
La Nariz wrote:Has this whole thread been a bunch of tears over much need balance and highsec nerfs? why, are you surprised? |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2768
|
Posted - 2014.03.24 11:58:00 -
[40] - Quote
while we're making bonkers arguments with as little evidence as possible:
while csm voting included the option to abstain, less than one percent of voters chose to abstain with the number decreasing each year
since the vote is voluntary, the people who abstained surely must dislike the csm
therefore the other ninety-nine percent surely do not dislike the csm's representation?
as i said. while we're making unsubstantiated claims, i'll make mine, too |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2768
|
Posted - 2014.03.24 12:02:00 -
[41] - Quote
does an elected representative have a mandate to represent the non-voting population
why the hell does this matter anyway |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2768
|
Posted - 2014.03.24 12:04:00 -
[42] - Quote
oh christ on a bike this derail began with 'let's assume a csm is leaking info because because, guys'
how about the insane idiot who made that claim proves it before we start demanding anyone proves anything
OH RIGHT IT WAS DINSDALE |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2770
|
Posted - 2014.03.24 12:08:00 -
[43] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Benny Ohu wrote:oh christ on a bike this derail began with 'let's assume a csm is leaking info because because, guys'
how about the insane idiot who made that claim proves it before we start demanding anyone proves anything
OH RIGHT IT WAS DINSDALE Yeah, who needs proof when you can make vague insinuations that you never have to back up with facts? That's the best part of conspiracy theories, silly Benny. vOv little does he know CCP is just a CIA false front that accidentally became succesful |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2770
|
Posted - 2014.03.24 12:23:00 -
[44] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Tippia wrote: Demonstrate how it is in every way impossible for the sample to be representative. You have not proven that it is possible. Therefore there is no onus to disprove what you could not, and have not, proven to begin with. might need to look back at the thread to see which claim was made first there |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2770
|
Posted - 2014.03.24 12:24:00 -
[45] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Well lets be real here. Ofc info is being leaked and ofc people are leveraging change towards their own interests.
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Sarah McKnobbo wrote:Why of course? I'm not siding either way, it's just a bit drastic to state out right that that is what's happening, don't you think.
Yes i'm sure, even hope, that people (assuming you mean the CSM) are leveraging it towards thier own interests as that is usually what they are elected on. I have no issue with the CSM system. Nor with info being leaked or interests being leveraged. CSM is afterall merely an advisory counsel, no actual authority or power. Having said that, insider info exploitaiton is the bigger risk than "influencing" CCP. Its arbitrary whether anyone can sway CCP. But the insider info is always extremely valuable. It is important to remember the very small % of the player base that has actually voted for them. Representation is proportional to how many votes they get, and since the overwhelming majority of players have not voted for them, they cannot be said to represent the interests of those who have not voted for them (ie: the overwhelming majority of the EVE player base). If it was up to me, Id disband the CSM in any term where less than 50-51% of the player base has voted. Thats not up to me, and since CSM have no direct power or authority, its not as important. But it cannot be said that they represent the majority interests of players, even combined throughout the entire panel. Thats just a cold hard fact. And it would be naive to think insider info is not leveraged for personal interests, or that counsel to CCP would not be motivated by self interest. No tinfoil hat required on that one and as I said, claiming otherwise is infact tinfoil hattery in and of itself.
|

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2770
|
Posted - 2014.03.24 12:32:00 -
[46] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Benny Ohu wrote:might need to look back at the thread to see which claim was made first there This claim was made by her here: Tippia wrote:The 14% that vote can be a fully representative cross-section of the entire EVE population. She has not proven this to be true. you made the claim first that "since the overwhelming majority of players have not voted for them, they cannot be said to represent the interests of those who have not voted for them" |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2770
|
Posted - 2014.03.24 12:43:00 -
[47] - Quote
even if everyone voted one person could still be dissatisfied so that's not a difference between 100% and 14% of the vote ? |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2773
|
Posted - 2014.03.24 12:51:00 -
[48] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:That's just splitting hairs, literally.
figuratively |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2783
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 00:34:00 -
[49] - Quote
Abla Tive wrote:By nerfing my reprocessing gains, CCP is driving me towards a very restricted type of "optimal" mission grinding where things like ISK / hour are important.
I suspect that this will make the game less enjoyable for me.
When the high sec POCO's came out, I could not be arsed enough to determine if the alliance that owned the POCOs in my local space were deserving of my tax money, so I stopped doing PI. (And I was certainly not going to fund undeserving people, giving taxes to NPCs and giving taxes to PCs are completely different things in my books).
That made the game narrower for me.
Now, I am being boxed in my mission and industrial play style and I fear for my enjoyment. you're making the game narrower for you |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2783
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 23:36:00 -
[50] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:Mara Rinn wrote:The only issue I have with the reprocessing changes is allowing outposts to have a better refine efficiency than POSes. words Sure, an outpost costs tens of billions of ISK to set up and upgrade, almost as much as a single titan. The advantage that outpost has in refining efficiency will pay for the entire outpost in a few months of reprocessing. So you can stop crying your crocodile tears right there. Nevermind that outposts can't be destroyed so you'll never actually lose the materials you leave behind when someone captures it (just capture it back, or stay in the outpost so you can ship stuff out). Capturing back an outpost is a whole lot easier than taking back a POS that has been destroyed. I think everyone wants to be able to blow up outposts in the future, and if these changes are on the road to making nullsec more livable and redoing the sov system (I think they are), that's probably the plan. The biggest issue with destructible outposts was over what to do with people's assets left inside.
I think that making outposts useful as more than just as a place to dock is what has to come first, though. I'm hoping that's what's going on. |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2783
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 23:38:00 -
[51] - Quote
continuing to draw attention towards our efforts will leave us no choice but to advance our schedule. |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2784
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 03:28:00 -
[52] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:Benny Ohu wrote:I think everyone wants to be able to blow up outposts in the future, and if these changes are on the road to making nullsec more livable and redoing the sov system (I think they are), that's probably the plan. The biggest issue with destructible outposts was over what to do with people's assets left inside.
I think that making outposts useful as more than just as a place to dock is what has to come first, though. I'm hoping that's what's going on. A destructible outpost is still a lower risk investment than a POS. More hit points to start with, and you'll be facing bigger fleets since outposts are more important to everyone in the alliance. Outposts already have more value than a POS due to material logistics. When CCP gets around to rebalancing manufacturing lines, you'll see outposts becoming even more valuable simply because you have so much more storage capacity than a POS. Outposts don't need an advantage in game mechanics to support their value. They're already worth everything alliances pay for them, otherwise alliances wouldn't build them. Maybe they'll be better targets (less timers) or more desirable targets than now if they were destructible. I don't know and I don't really want to speculate, I just wanted to bring up the possibility that changes to the risk of operating in outposts may be planned |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2787
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 00:40:00 -
[53] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:
Same way they have killed pvp in every single other MMO that added them. If you want arena pvp you go play one of those other countless MMOs that has it.
in city of heroes arenas were only used for erotic roleplay |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2788
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 06:54:00 -
[54] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote: We could easily see mineral prices fall. Null gains nearly 20% extra reprocessing for the same Ore. So it's actually profitable for them to buy ore in highsec, compress, ship to null, refine, then ship back to high sec.
doubt anyone wants to ship uncompressed minerals back to highsec |
| |
|